In this issue of Horse 
									Sense:
									
									--Solid State Drive Experience Testing
									--Why NOT to Use an E Mail "I Am Out" 
									Message
									--Betting on the Future:  Beta Testing
									----Example:  The IPAD (Iron Maiden)
									----Example:  Symform
									----Example:  Symantec (with an offer to 
									experience unreleased products!)
									
									
									
									Solid State 
									Drive Experience Testing
									
									
									It is one thing to talk about 
									speeds, feeds, and specifications.  It is 
									another to actually experience a product.  I 
									have talked about solid state disk drives in 
									the past, but now I have had one in my 
									notebook for a couple of months and I am not 
									going back to a magnetic hard disk.  I have 
									an older, but still respectable notebook 
									with a 2007 BIOS date.  It is a Core 2 Duo 
									T7300 at 2GHz with 2GB of RAM, so it is not 
									a speed demon.  I squeeze even more life out 
									of my PCs than do most of my customers.  I 
									had a 5400 rpm 120GB Seagate Momentus 5400.3 
									hard disk in the machine.  I replaced it 
									with a Kingston 128GB SNVP325S2128GB solid 
									state drive.  The Windows Experience Index 
									didn't change since it is based on the 
									lowest number it finds, but the disk index 
									went from 4.8 to 7.1.  The data sheet on 
									this drive said I could get near 230MB/s in 
									sequential read and 180MB/s in sequential 
									write performance, and my tests came close 
									enough to that to believe those numbers.
									
									Switching to the solid state disk was 
									relatively hard since I decided I did not 
									want to bring all my Windows Vista  warts 
									with me and upgraded to Windows 7 at the 
									same time.  Windows 7 also is the first 
									Microsoft operating system to understand how 
									to better utilize a solid state disk, though 
									they still work fine on older operating 
									systems.  First, I made an image backup of 
									the old hard drive.  Then I pulled it out of 
									the system and installed the brand new solid 
									state drive.  Formatting and installation 
									were incredibly fast.  Now came the tricky 
									part, my old programs and data.  Laplink's 
									PC Mover helped a lot.  It allowed me to 
									attach the old hard drive to my computer and 
									transfer all the programs, their 
									authorization keys, the program settings, 
									and all my data.  That turned out to be over 
									10 gigabytes of information.  This was a 
									relatively slow process since I had the old 
									drive connected via a USB 2.0 cable.  I had 
									to test everything to make sure it was how I 
									wanted it and make adjustments that favored 
									the new operating system.  This was the 
									longest part of the process.  I do recommend 
									PC Mover if you are transitioning an older 
									Windows machine to Windows 7, but do not 
									expect it to do everything.  You will still 
									want to confidence check all your programs, 
									for example.
									
									Typing this newsletter or surfing the web is 
									just the same with a solid state drive.  
									Where the disk is heavily involved, the 
									difference is startling.  My machine's case 
									is no longer hot to the touch on the 
									bottom.  It lasts longer on a battery 
									charge.  I do not treat my PC quite as 
									gingerly any more because I know the solid 
									state disk is more resistant to shocks and 
									changing the orientation of the laptop will 
									not hurt it either.  The machine boots up so 
									quickly that I do not think twice about 
									shutting it down any more.  It resumes 
									quickly from powered down states, including 
									full hibernation which I did not allow 
									previously.  Occasionally, my system used to 
									"stutter" while it wrote something to the 
									hard disk.  This now happens rarely and the 
									"stutter" takes less time.  Antiviral scans 
									of my hard disk complete very quickly.  What 
									probably surprised me the most is that 
									transfers via the network got smoother and 
									faster.  Full system image backups are a 
									breeze.  Video training sessions or TV shows 
									on my laptop show less stutter and there is 
									also no noise from the hard disk working and 
									little from the system fan because it does 
									not have to work as hard to keep the laptop 
									cool.
									
									The Return on Grief (tm) on my laptop 
									upgrade was significant, but....  I really 
									have not been able to stress the solid state 
									drive.  To do that, I would need a much more 
									powerful machine.  There has been no 
									downside to this upgrade, other than the 
									cost of the device and the conversion 
									effort.  While the conversion effort is 
									always the biggest cost in doing something 
									like this, and my conversion was much more 
									difficult because I switched operating 
									systems, the speed of the solid state disk 
									cut down the time needed significantly.  
									Based on my experiences, I would recommend 
									that you strongly consider a solid state 
									drive for all of your laptops.  I recommend 
									solid state drives as boot drives (if not 
									the only drive) in your desktop systems.  I 
									also recommend solid state drives as boot, 
									cache, or just plain storage drives for your 
									servers.  Anyone building a multimedia PC or 
									who is replacing a drive in a consumer 
									electronic device will appreciate the speed 
									and quiet of solid state drives.  You cannot 
									get the full benefit of a high performance 
									desktop, laptop, or server without solid 
									state disk technology since disk access is 
									one of the greater limiting factors in what 
									you can do on your computer today.  The cost 
									of a solid state hard drive is now under $2 
									per gigabyte, while large traditional hard 
									disks can reach all the way down to 5 cents 
									per gigabyte.  That difference is 
									significant, but, unless you are using 
									massive amounts of storage, it should not 
									stop you from using solid state drives now.  
									You will easily earn back the extra money 
									you pay with productivity improvements in 
									only a month or two.
									
									
 
									Why NOT to 
									Use an E Mail "I Am Out" Message
									
									
									I never use "I am out" messages 
									personally with my e mail or phones.  If you 
									put a vacation e mail message on your home e 
									mail address, you could be saying to someone 
									"I am out.  Please burglarize my house while 
									I am gone."  If you do this at the office, 
									you could be saying "I am on vacation until 
									next week.  In the meantime, if you want to 
									sneak something past my coworkers and 
									circumvent our security, this is a good 
									time."  Such messages can help social 
									engineers like Kevin Mitnick, who wrote the 
									terrifying book "The Art of Deception: 
									Controlling the Human Element of Security", 
									to more easily break through your security.  
									[I recommend security professionals and even 
									non-professionals read this book, if only to 
									hammer home how the weak link in computer 
									security is the one typing at the 
									keyboard.]  Of course, you need to decide 
									whether your work requires such a message.  
									Most do not.
									
									I also recommend against leaving an old user 
									e mail account open, at least for more than 
									a couple of days.  Cancel all of the list 
									subscriptions coming into the account.  
									Inform everyone that person is no longer 
									there.  Then remove the account and let the 
									messages bounce.  This will immediately tell 
									the people sending the mail that they need 
									to resend their mail to someone else.  Do 
									not forward the mail or keep that account 
									open.  Open accounts can be used as a way to 
									compromise your security.  Or these accounts 
									can simply be a place where someone sends an 
									important message and does not realize no 
									one on your end saw it.
									
									You might want to follow this advice, but at 
									least I have warned you about a very common 
									security issue.
									
									
 
									Betting on 
									the Future:  Beta Testing
									
									
									Lately I have been doing quite a 
									bit of beta testing for software 
									developers.  I am the guinea pig that gets 
									to try out "new and improved" software 
									before it hits someone else's desktop.  
									There are reasons to have beta testers.  
									First, they often have a vested interest in 
									seeing a new feature appear and have 
									definite ideas of how it should work.  
									Second, they will put up with beta (equals 
									broken or not ready for prime time) software 
									to test it out.  Third, they will do things 
									that programmers never thought of when 
									designing the code and "break" it.  Fourth, 
									they will ask questions and misunderstand 
									explanations requiring another look at how 
									to better get the message across when the 
									product ships.  Fifth, they will use it in a 
									range of environments and do a number of 
									things the programmers cannot model in a 
									clean test environment.  Beta testers serve 
									somewhat the same function as the people I 
									get to proofread Horse Sense before I send 
									it out.  They help to determine how well the 
									end product will be received by a larger 
									audience.
									
									
									Example--The IPAD (Iron Maiden)
									
									I just finished a beta test of a 
									unified secure server called the IPAD. It 
									has no relation to the iPAD and had this 
									name far before Apple started to put the 
									small letter I in front of everything.  We 
									are looking for a new name for it.  I like 
									the Iron Maiden myself.  Beta testers get to 
									comment on marketing, support, and sales 
									issues as well.  
									
									The web manageable IPAD server serves as a 
									firewall, a router, a secure web server, a 
									list manager, an FTP server, a DHCP server, 
									a POP/SMTP mail server, a DNS server, and an 
									antispam device.  It will handle 192 modems 
									and 5 gigabit Ethernet interfaces.  You can 
									even monitor vital statistics with SNMP, 
									like how many e mails, spam and non-spam, 
									you are getting.  Each server runs on top of 
									a secure purpose built operating system.  
									All of these functions happen in less than 
									16 megabytes of RAM.  I know of ISPs using 
									the IPAD that serve thousands of users and 
									domains with a single box running on 
									hardware you would laugh at if it were on 
									your desktop.  I sent Horse Sense out to as 
									many as 180,000 e mail addresses on a 33MHz 
									Intel 486.  The current machine sending out 
									these e mails is a 1.5GHz Pentium 4 because 
									the old machine died.  I am now collecting 
									feature requests for the next version.  Like 
									all modern software, a new version is always 
									in development.  I have been running an IPAD 
									in my office for 15+ years.  It is nice to 
									be able to literally talk to the developers 
									and get them to develop a feature I want.  
									The price is right, too.  All this 
									capability comes at a price less than what 
									it costs me for a single application for my 
									workstation.
									
									Based on my use of this product, I think 
									small businesses, schools, and other 
									organizations that need as secure, 
									inexpensive, powerful, and feature rich 
									product to protect their network and provide 
									secure services could really enjoy this 
									product as either a product or a service.  
									In fact, if you only use *one* of the 
									functions, like DNS or e mail, you could 
									easily get your money's worth.  
									
									Example--Symform
									
									Backup is costly in terms of 
									time, effort, and money.  Off site storage 
									can be particularly expensive.  But Intel 
									has a new partnership with Symform that may 
									change all that.  Symform has been having me 
									test their latest on line storage product 
									which seems to be a winner.  Technically, 
									this is not a beta product as far as Symform 
									is concerned, but Intel wanted to see if it 
									was suitable for its resellers and a larger 
									audience.  As a reseller, I tend to test all 
									new products as if they were unfinished to 
									find all the good and bad out before I have 
									clients put them in production on their 
									sites.  I encourage you to do the same.  
									Beta testing never ends and making comments 
									on existing products and offering to become 
									a beta tester is a good way to get what you 
									want out of the next or even current version 
									of a product.
									
									Symform's support is good, just like it is 
									for the IPAD.  You want security and 
									reliability products that are central to 
									your business to have good support.  The 
									price is right.  No matter how much data you 
									want to back up, the price is fixed.  And, 
									the model is interesting.  You pay to back 
									up a server or workstation.  That is it.  
									But.... You must also contribute storage 
									space and bandwidth you own so that others 
									can back up data to your equipment.  There 
									is a centralized data center, but it is 
									mainly there to coordinate accounting and 
									where all the data is.  High capacity hard 
									drives are inexpensive and network bandwidth 
									may be plentiful and unused, so this can be 
									a great fit for many organizations, 
									especially schools and small businesses.  
									Storing data in data centers can be very 
									expensive, so using your own storage is an 
									interesting alternative.  Should you worry 
									about security, reliability, and 
									performance?  Well, these guys have really 
									thought it out.  They assume the worst.  
									They assume that your the communications are 
									insecure and that the storage locations are 
									insecure and unreliable and have limited 
									bandwidth.  To deal with these issues, they 
									break up your files to be backed up into 
									more manageable pieces.  They encrypt them 
									with military grade AES 256 bit encryption 
									before they are sent out of your network.  
									These pieces get stored all over the 
									Internet in their encrypted form.  They use 
									an algorithm that allows 32 different 
									storage nodes to become unavailable and you 
									will still be able to get your data back.  
									Performance is potentially improved versus 
									storing data at a storage provider on the 
									Internet because each location that has your 
									data can send you data you need at the same 
									time which eliminates a lot of performance 
									bottlenecks.  The encryption and division of 
									your backups make them very secure.  Their 
									methods should pass any security audit.  If 
									you wanted to be even more secure, you could 
									encrypt your backup on your side before it 
									is encrypted again and sent out to someone 
									else's machine.
									
									To be truthful, Symform is not really a 
									backup application.  It is synchronization 
									software.  You must have a backup mechanism 
									that puts the files you want into 
									directories you want backed up.  Any backup 
									program, including just copying files to 
									that directory, will work.  I have been 
									using Symantec's Backup Exec System Recovery 
									drive imaging product.  It produces very 
									large backup files, but is dead simple to 
									use, allows you to restore absolutely 
									everything even to dissimilar hardware or a 
									virtual image, allows for individual file or 
									e mail recovery, and is fairly fast on my 
									local network.  These large files are a 
									problem when it comes to using Symform, 
									though, because synchronizing them out to 
									other machines on the Internet takes a long 
									time.  Still, it works, and if I ever want 
									to restore, because my ISP gives me a 
									download speed that is a minimum of 5 times 
									as fast as my upload speed, I can recover 
									these large files more quickly than I backed 
									them up.
									
									You can contribute storage and bandwidth 
									from anywhere, like your house.  You can 
									even contribute for someone else, like for a 
									laptop you want to back up.  Another 
									interesting option is that you can 
									synchronize a directory to another site that 
									you own for a more rapid recovery or as a 
									way to distribute data automatically.  If 
									you have two locations or your boss wants to 
									back up an image of everything to his house 
									so that you do not even have to do a 
									download if there is a data disaster, you 
									can do it.
									
									Secure data synchronization software like 
									this belongs in most organizations.  Intel 
									sees the future in it and has partnered with 
									Symform to make it more available.  
									Automatic off site backup is a necessary 
									part of your data protection strategy.  
									There are many backup options in the market 
									and Iron Horse would be happy to discuss 
									them with you.
									
									
									Example--Symantec
									
									Symantec is the biggest security 
									software company in the world.  Their 
									footprint means that they have products that 
									have to work for your 80 year old mom and 
									security professionals in governments.  
									Obviously, the customers will have very 
									different needs.  Symantec spends 
									unbelievable amounts of time testing its 
									products for reliability, efficacy, and 
									performance.  When it comes to businesses, 
									Symantec has a lot more to worry about.  
									Businesses want to be able to tailor 
									products to their needs, monitor and manage 
									them across all their resources, use it with 
									products that consumers would never touch, 
									enforce policy, etcetera.  Symantec tests 
									out some of its latest and greatest security 
									technologies on consumers via its Norton 
									products (see Horse 
									Sense #88 Are You Testing Software for 
									Someone Else?
									
									<http://www.ih-online.com/hs88.html>).  
									Many of these technologies end up in 
									Symantec's corporate products.  Symantec's 
									corporate beta programs test out these 
									technologies, other technologies, and 
									management features needed in the business 
									world.  Symantec has asked me to comment on 
									their corporate products more than once, and 
									I have also supplied unasked for comments.  
									(grin)  Recently, Symantec asked me what my 
									customers might want to see in an endpoint 
									protection product.  I plan on telling you 
									more about that in my next Horse Sense.  
									Even more interesting is they asked if I had 
									clients who might want to test drive their 
									next generation products in beta programs.
									
									Good software and hardware engineers never 
									rest on their laurels.  They examine what is 
									and is not working well now and work with 
									clients to develop more relevant products 
									for the future.  
									
									If you are 
									interested in Symantec's offer to become a 
									beta tester, please contact us.
									
									
									If you want to ask about other 
									hardware, software, or technology, or if you 
									are interested in being a beta tester for 
									someone else you know who to call....
									©2011 Tony 
									Stirk, Iron Horse tstirk@ih-online.com